Bibliography
The complete, alphabetized set of citations for the entire website — every paper, review, benchmark, and software reference used anywhere across the workshop. Individual chapters each end with their own References section listing only the works they cite; this page collects them all in one place.
1.
Tang, F. et al. mRNA-seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nature Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
2.
Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
3.
Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
4.
Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nature Communications 8, 14049 (2017).
5.
Luecken, M. D. & Theis, F. J. Current best practices in single-cell RNA-seq analysis: A tutorial. Molecular Systems Biology 15, e8746 (2019).
6.
Kharchenko, P. V. The triumphs and limitations of computational methods for scRNA-seq. Nature Methods 18, 723–732 (2021).
7.
Heumos, L. et al. Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities. Nature Reviews Genetics 24, 550–572 (2023).
8.
Lähnemann, D. et al. Eleven grand challenges in single-cell data science. Genome Biology 21, 31 (2020).
9.
Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Molecular Cell 65, 631–643 (2017).
10.
Svensson, V., Vento-Tormo, R. & Teichmann, S. A. Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade. Nature Protocols 13, 599–604 (2018).
11.
Kang, H. M. et al. Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation. Nature Biotechnology 36, 89–94 (2018).
12.
Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nature Biotechnology 33, 495–502 (2015).
13.
Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nature Biotechnology 33, 495–502 (2015).
14.
Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).
15.
Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).
16.
Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nature Biotechnology 42, 293–304 (2024).
17.
Wolf, F. A., Angerer, P. & Theis, F. J. SCANPY: Large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biology 19, 15 (2018).
18.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2024).
19.
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software 4, 1686 (2019).
20.
Amezquita, R. A. et al. Orchestrating single-cell analysis with Bioconductor. Nature Methods 17, 137–145 (2020).
21.
Lun, A. T. L. et al. EmptyDrops: Distinguishing cells from empty droplets in droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 20, 63 (2019).
22.
Young, M. D. & Behjati, S. SoupX removes ambient RNA contamination from droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing data. GigaScience 9, giaa151 (2020).
23.
Fleming, S. J. et al. Unsupervised removal of systematic background noise from droplet-based single-cell experiments using CellBender. Nature Methods 20, 1323–1335 (2023).
24.
Yang, S. et al. Decontamination of ambient RNA in single-cell RNA-seq with DecontX. Genome Biology 21, 57 (2020).
25.
McGinnis, C. S., Murrow, L. M. & Gartner, Z. J. DoubletFinder: Doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Systems 8, 329–337 (2019).
26.
Wolock, S. L., Lopez, R. & Klein, A. M. Scrublet: Computational identification of cell doublets in single-cell transcriptomic data. Cell Systems 8, 281–291 (2019).
27.
Germain, P.-L., Lun, A., Garcia Meixide, C., Macnair, W. & Robinson, M. D. Doublet identification in single-cell sequencing data using scDblFinder. F1000Research 10, 979 (2021).
28.
Xi, N. M. & Li, J. J. Benchmarking computational doublet-detection methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Cell Systems 12, 176–194 (2021).
29.
Hafemeister, C. & Satija, R. Normalization and variance stabilization of single-cell RNA-seq data using regularized negative binomial regression. Genome Biology 20, 296 (2019).
30.
Lun, A. T. L., Bach, K. & Marioni, J. C. Pooling across cells to normalize single-cell RNA sequencing data with many zero counts. Genome Biology 17, 75 (2016).
31.
Ahlmann-Eltze, C. & Huber, W. Comparison of transformations for single-cell RNA-seq data. Nature Methods 20, 665–672 (2023).
32.
Ilicic, T. et al. Classification of low quality cells from single-cell RNA-seq data. Genome Biology 17, 29 (2016).
33.
Maaten, L. van der & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
34.
Becht, E. et al. Dimensionality reduction for visualizing single-cell data using UMAP. Nature Biotechnology 37, 38–44 (2019).
35.
McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426 (2018) doi:10.48550/arXiv.1802.03426.
36.
Kobak, D. & Berens, P. The art of using t-SNE for single-cell transcriptomics. Nature Communications 10, 5416 (2019).
37.
Kobak, D. & Linderman, G. C. Initialization is critical for preserving global data structure in both t-SNE and UMAP. Nature Biotechnology 39, 156–157 (2021).
38.
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008, P10008 (2008).
39.
Traag, V. A., Waltman, L. & Eck, N. J. van. From Louvain to Leiden: Guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific Reports 9, 5233 (2019).
40.
Kiselev, V. Yu., Andrews, T. S. & Hemberg, M. Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data. Nature Reviews Genetics 20, 273–282 (2019).
41.
Duò, A., Robinson, M. D. & Soneson, C. A systematic performance evaluation of clustering methods for single-cell RNA-seq data. F1000Research 7, 1141 (2018).
42.
Yu, L., Cao, Y., Yang, J. Y. H. & Yang, P. Benchmarking clustering algorithms on estimating the number of cell types from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Genome Biology 23, 49 (2022).
43.
Clarke, Z. A. et al. Tutorial: Guidelines for annotating single-cell transcriptomic maps using automated and manual methods. Nature Protocols 16, 2749–2764 (2021).
44.
Soneson, C. & Robinson, M. D. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nature Methods 15, 255–261 (2018).
45.
Franzén, O., Gan, L.-M. & Björkegren, J. L. M. PanglaoDB: A web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data. Database 2019, baz046 (2019).
46.
Hu, C. et al. CellMarker 2.0: An updated database of manually curated cell markers in human/mouse and web tools based on scRNA-seq data. Nucleic Acids Research 51, D870–D876 (2023).
47.
Aran, D. et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nature Immunology 20, 163–172 (2019).
48.
Domínguez Conde, C. et al. Cross-tissue immune cell analysis reveals tissue-specific features in humans. Science 376, eabl5197 (2022).
49.
Abdelaal, T. et al. A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 20, 194 (2019).
50.
Pasquini, G., Rojo Arias, J. E., Schäfer, P. & Busskamp, V. Automated methods for cell type annotation on scRNA-seq data. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 19, 961–969 (2021).
51.
Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nature Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).
52.
Haghverdi, L., Lun, A. T. L., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Batch effects in single-cell RNA-sequencing data are corrected by matching mutual nearest neighbors. Nature Biotechnology 36, 421–427 (2018).
53.
Lopez, R., Regier, J., Cole, M. B., Jordan, M. I. & Yosef, N. Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics. Nature Methods 15, 1053–1058 (2018).
54.
Xu, C. et al. Probabilistic harmonization and annotation of single-cell transcriptomics data with deep generative models. Molecular Systems Biology 17, e9620 (2021).
55.
Tran, H. T. N. et al. A benchmark of batch-effect correction methods for single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Biology 21, 12 (2020).
56.
Luecken, M. D. et al. Benchmarking atlas-level data integration in single-cell genomics. Nature Methods 19, 41–50 (2022).
57.
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biology 15, 550 (2014).
58.
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
59.
Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. Voom: Precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biology 15, R29 (2014).
60.
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research 43, e47 (2015).
61.
Rapaport, F. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biology 14, R95 (2013).
62.
Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nature Communications 12, 5692 (2021).
63.
Crowell, H. L. et al. Muscat detects subpopulation-specific state transitions from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Nature Communications 11, 6077 (2020).
64.
Zhu, A., Ibrahim, J. G. & Love, M. I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: Removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 35, 2084–2092 (2019).
65.
Zimmerman, K. D., Espeland, M. A. & Langefeld, C. D. A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies. Nature Communications 12, 738 (2021).
66.
Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 57, 289–300 (1995).
67.
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
68.
Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 25–29 (2000).
69.
Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 28, 27–30 (2000).
70.
Khatri, P., Sirota, M. & Butte, A. J. Ten years of pathway analysis: Current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Computational Biology 8, e1002375 (2012).
71.
Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: An R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 16, 284–287 (2012).
72.
Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. The Innovation 2, 100141 (2021).
73.
Korotkevich, G. et al. Fast gene set enrichment analysis. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/060012 (2021) doi:10.1101/060012.
74.
Gillespie, M. et al. The Reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Research 50, D687–D692 (2022).
75.
Geistlinger, L. et al. Toward a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis. Briefings in Bioinformatics 22, 545–556 (2021).
76.
Liberzon, A. et al. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Systems 1, 417–425 (2015).
77.
Dann, E., Henderson, N. C., Teichmann, S. A., Morgan, M. D. & Marioni, J. C. Differential abundance testing on single-cell data using k-nearest neighbor graphs. Nature Biotechnology 40, 245–253 (2022).
78.
Büttner, M., Ostner, J., Müller, C. L., Theis, F. J. & Schubert, B. scCODA is a Bayesian model for compositional single-cell data analysis. Nature Communications 12, 6876 (2021).
79.
Mangiola, S. et al. Sccomp: Robust differential composition and variability analysis for single-cell data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, e2203828120 (2023).
80.
Phipson, B. et al. Propeller: Testing for differences in cell type proportions in single cell data. Bioinformatics 38, 4720–4726 (2022).
81.
Yi, X., Liu, H., et al. Benchmarking of differential abundance analysis methods for single-cell data. Genome Biology 25, 15 (2024).
82.
Yoo, A. B., Jette, M. A. & Grondona, M. SLURM: Simple linux utility for resource management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2862, 44–60 (2003).
83.
Merkel, D. Docker: Lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux Journal 2014, 2 (2014).
84.
Kurtzer, G. M., Sochat, V. & Bauer, M. W. Singularity: Scientific containers for mobility of compute. PLoS ONE 12, e0177459 (2017).
85.
Mölder, F. et al. Sustainable data analysis with Snakemake. F1000Research 10, 33 (2021).
86.
Di Tommaso, P. et al. Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nature Biotechnology 35, 316–319 (2017).
87.
Grüning, B. et al. Bioconda: Sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. Nature Methods 15, 475–476 (2018).
88.
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: Ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
89.
Kaminow, B., Yunusov, D. & Dobin, A. STARsolo: Accurate, fast and versatile mapping/quantification of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-seq data. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.05.442755 (2021) doi:10.1101/2021.05.05.442755.
90.
Melsted, P. et al. Modular, efficient and constant-memory single-cell RNA-seq preprocessing. Nature Biotechnology 39, 813–818 (2021).
91.
Srivastava, A., Malik, L., Smith, T., Sudbery, I. & Patro, R. Alevin efficiently estimates accurate gene abundances from dscRNA-seq data. Genome Biology 20, 65 (2019).
92.
Smith, T., Heger, A. & Sudbery, I. UMI-tools: Modeling sequencing errors in unique molecular identifiers to improve quantification accuracy. Genome Research 27, 491–499 (2017).
93.
Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 4, Article 17 (2005).
94.
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008).
95.
Dam, S. van, Võsa, U., Graaf, A. van der, Franke, L. & Magalhães, J. P. de. Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene-disease predictions. Briefings in Bioinformatics 19, 575–592 (2018).
96.
Morabito, S., Reese, F., Rahimzadeh, N., Miyoshi, E. & Swarup, V. hdWGCNA identifies co-expression networks in high-dimensional transcriptomics data. Cell Reports Methods 3, 100498 (2023).
97.
Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R., Todorov, H. & Saeys, Y. A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods. Nature Biotechnology 37, 547–554 (2019).
98.
Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nature Biotechnology 32, 381–386 (2014).
99.
Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019).
100.
Street, K. et al. Slingshot: Cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genomics 19, 477 (2018).
102.
Bergen, V., Lange, M., Peidli, S., Wolf, F. A. & Theis, F. J. Generalizing RNA velocity to transient cell states through dynamical modeling. Nature Biotechnology 38, 1408–1414 (2020).
103.
Armingol, E., Officer, A., Harismendy, O. & Lewis, N. E. Deciphering cell-cell interactions and communication from gene expression. Nature Reviews Genetics 22, 71–88 (2021).
104.
Armingol, E., Baghdassarian, H. M. & Lewis, N. E. The diversification of methods for studying cell-cell interactions and communication. Nature Reviews Genetics 25, 381–400 (2024).
105.
Dimitrov, D. et al. Comparison of methods and resources for cell-cell communication inference from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nature Communications 13, 3224 (2022).
106.
Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nature Communications 12, 1088 (2021).
107.
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nature Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
108.
Klemm, S. L., Shipony, Z. & Greenleaf, W. J. Chromatin accessibility and the regulatory epigenome. Nature Reviews Genetics 20, 207–220 (2019).
109.
Stuart, T., Srivastava, A., Madad, S., Lareau, C. A. & Satija, R. Single-cell chromatin state analysis with Signac. Nature Methods 18, 1333–1341 (2021).
110.
Granja, J. M. et al. ArchR is a scalable software package for integrative single-cell chromatin accessibility analysis. Nature Genetics 53, 403–411 (2021).
111.
De Rop, F. V. et al. Systematic benchmarking of single-cell ATAC-sequencing protocols. Nature Biotechnology 42, 916–926 (2024).
112.
Cusanovich, D. A. et al. A single-cell atlas of in vivo mammalian chromatin accessibility. Cell 174, 1309–1324 (2018).
113.
Schep, A. N., Wu, B., Buenrostro, J. D. & Greenleaf, W. J. chromVAR: Inferring transcription-factor-associated accessibility from single-cell epigenomic data. Nature Methods 14, 975–978 (2017).
114.
Luo, Z. et al. Benchmarking computational methods for single-cell chromatin accessibility data. Genome Biology 25, 225 (2024).
115.
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-seq (MACS). Genome Biology 9, R137 (2008).
116.
Ståhl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).
117.
Rao, A., Barkley, D., França, G. S. & Yanai, I. Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcriptomics. Nature 596, 211–220 (2021).
118.
Moses, L. & Pachter, L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods 19, 534–546 (2022).
119.
Bressan, D., Battistoni, G. & Hannon, G. J. The dawn of spatial omics. Science 381, eabq4964 (2023).
120.
Palla, G. et al. Squidpy: A scalable framework for spatial omics analysis. Nature Methods 19, 171–178 (2022).
121.
Cable, D. M. et al. Robust decomposition of cell type mixtures in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology 40, 517–526 (2022).
122.
Kleshchevnikov, V. et al. Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology 40, 661–671 (2022).
123.
Moffitt, J. R. et al. Molecular, spatial, and functional single-cell profiling of the hypothalamic preoptic region. Science 362, eaau5324 (2018).
124.
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3, 160018 (2016).
125.
Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas. eLife 6, e27041 (2017).
126.
Osumi-Sutherland, D. et al. Cell type ontologies of the human cell atlas. Nature Cell Biology 23, 1129–1135 (2021).
127.
CZI Cell Science Program et al. CZ CELLxGENE discover: A single-cell data platform for scalable exploration, analysis and modeling of aggregated data. Nucleic Acids Research 53, D886–D900 (2025).
128.
Leinonen, R., Sugawara, H., Shumway, M. & International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Research 39, D19–D21 (2011).
129.
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
130.
Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. GigaScience 10, giab008 (2021).
131.
Frankish, A. et al. GENCODE 2021. Nucleic Acids Research 49, D916–D923 (2021).
132.
Chacon, S. & Straub, B. Pro Git. (Apress, 2014).
133.
Friedl, J. E. F. Mastering Regular Expressions. (O’Reilly Media, 2006).
134.
Barrett, T. et al. NCBI GEO: Archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Research 41, D991–D995 (2013).
135.
Argelaguet, R. et al. MOFA+: A statistical framework for comprehensive integration of multi-modal single-cell data. Genome Biology 21, 111 (2020).
136.
Tabula Sapiens Consortium. The tabula sapiens: A multiple-organ, single-cell transcriptomic atlas of humans. Science 376, eabl4896 (2022).
137.
Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A. & Marioni, J. C. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 16, 133–145 (2015).
138.
Gulati, G. S. et al. Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential. Science 367, 405–411 (2020).
139.
Browaeys, R., Saelens, W. & Saeys, Y. NicheNet: Modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nature Methods 17, 159–162 (2020).
140.
Van den Berge, K. et al. Trajectory-based differential expression analysis for single-cell sequencing data. Nature Communications 11, 1201 (2020).